Instructions for Authors
Submissions must be done via the HotCRP website. The link will be announced shortly before the
paper deadline.
ACNS 2027 will be an in-person conference. Since remote presentations or videos will not
be accepted, authors submitting a paper must ensure that one of the authors can present the
paper at the conference in person.
Submitted papers must not substantially overlap with papers that have been published (other than
preprint) or accepted for publication or that are simultaneously in submission to a journal,
conference, or workshop with published proceedings. Information about submissions may be shared
with program chairs of other conferences for that purpose.
ACNS encourages promising students to submit and present their results at the conference. ACNS
gives a best student paper award, with a 1500 EUR prize sponsored by Springer, to encourage
promising students to publish their best results at this venue. To be eligible, the paper must
be co-authored by at least one full-time student who will present the paper at the conference.
Systematization of Knowledge
ACNS 2027 solicits the submission of Systematisation of Knowledge (SoK) papers, which have been
very valuable to help our community to clarify and put into context complex research problems.
It is important to stress that SoK papers go beyond simply summarising previous research (like
in a survey) but also include a thorough examination and analysis of existing approaches,
identify gaps and limitations, and offer insights or new perspectives on a given, major research
area.
We encourage the authors to distinguish SoK submissions by adding the “SoK: ” prefix to the
title. SoK submissions will be reviewed by the full PC and held to the same standards as
traditional research papers, but they will be accepted based on their treatment of existing work
and value to the community, and not based on any new research results they may contain. Accepted
papers will be presented at the conference and included in the proceedings.
Submission Guidelines
Submissions must be anonymous, with no author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, or obvious
references. Each submission must begin with a title, a short abstract, and a list of keywords.
The introduction should summarise the contributions of the paper at a level appropriate for a
non- specialist reader.
All submissions must be submitted in PDF format, following the unmodified LNCS format
(accessible on the
Springer LCNS author guidelines
webpage) and typeset using the corresponding LaTeX class file. They must fit within a page limit
of 20 pages, including title and abstract, figures, etc., but excluding references. Optionally,
any amount of clearly marked supplementary material may be supplied, following the main body of
the paper; however, reviewers are not required to read or review any supplementary material, and
submissions are expected to be intelligible without it. Submissions not meeting these guidelines
risk rejection without consideration of their merits. To accommodate changes requested in
reviews, the page limit for the camera-ready proceedings versions is 30 pages, including
references and appendices.
For papers that might raise ethical concerns, authors are expected to convince reviewers that
proper procedures (such as Institutional Review Board approval) have been followed, and due
diligence has been made to minimise potential harm.
ACNS 2027 has two submission deadlines (in September and January) that authors may choose to
submit their papers to. Papers rejected after the September cycle cannot be resubmitted at the
January cycle.
We will publish our proceedings with Springer as a volume of the Lecture Notes in Computer
Science (LNCS) series.
Conflicts of Interest
The program co-chairs require cooperation from both authors and program committee members to
prevent submissions from being evaluated by reviewers who have a conflict of interest. During
the submission process, we will ask authors to identify members of the program committee with
whom they share a conflict of interest.
We regard the following relationships as conflicts of interest:
-
Anyone who shares an institutional affiliation with an author at the time of submission
(including secondary affiliations and consulting work),
- Anyone who was the advisor or advisee of an author at any time in the past,
- Anyone the author has collaborated or published within the prior two years,
-
Anyone who is serving as the sponsor or administrator of a grant that funds your research,
or
- Close personal or family ties.
If authors want to specify a conflict of another type than those listed above, they must contact
the chairs and explain the perceived conflict. Program committee members who are in a conflict
of interest with a paper, including program co-chairs, will be excluded from the evaluation and
discussion of the paper by default.
Ethical Considerations for Vulnerability Disclosure (adapted from IEEE S&P)
Where research identifies a vulnerability (e.g., software vulnerabilities in a given program,
design weaknesses in a hardware system, or any other kind of vulnerability in deployed systems),
we expect that researchers act in a way that avoids gratuitous harm to affected users and, where
possible, affirmatively protects those users. In nearly every case, disclosing the vulnerability
to vendors of affected systems, and other stakeholders, will help protect users. It is the
committee’s sense that a disclosure window of
45 days
to
90 days
ahead of publication is consistent with authors’ ethical obligations.
Diversity and Inclusion
ACNS is committed to promoting diversity and inclusion in our community. If you have
suggestions, concerns, or complaints related to biases or sexual harassment, we encourage you to
reach out to the Conference Co-Chairs. We are committed to protecting the anonymity of such
reports and helping to address your concerns. We value your feedback and ideas to help us all
build a healthier and more welcoming community.
We encourage authors to be mindful of not using language or examples that further the
marginalisation, stereotyping, or erasure of any group of people, especially historically
marginalised and/or under-represented groups (URGs) in computing. Of course, exclusionary
treatment can arise unintentionally. Be vigilant and actively guard against such issues in your
writing. Reviewers will also be empowered to monitor and demand changes if such issues arise in
your submissions.